Skip to main content
Architecture

Why Use XML for Configuration?

8 mins

An old-fashioned library card catalog system with drawers and index cards, illustrating the structured and searchable format of XML, making it easy to manage and locate specific configurations.

Purpose of Configuration Files #

Configuration files are used to store settings and parameters that are used to configure an application or system. These settings can include things like database connection strings, logging levels, and other parameters that control the behavior of the application. Configuration files are typically stored in a human-readable format so that they can be easily edited by developers and system administrators.

There are many popular formats for configuration files, such as JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) and YAML (YAML Ain’t Markup Language). These formats are widely used because they are easy to read and write, and they are supported by many programming languages and tools.

XML (eXtensible Markup Language) has been around for a long time and is still a popular choice for configuration files. There are several reasons why you might want to use XML for configuration files, even though there are newer and more popular formats available.

Configuration File Requirements #

When deciding the format and structure of your configuration files, there are several factors to consider.

Human Readable #

One of the most important factors is that the configuration file should be human-readable. This means that the file should be easy to read and understand, even for someone who is not familiar with the application or system.

Machine Readable #

In addition to being human-readable, the configuration file should also be machine-readable. The file that is easy for a computer to parse and interpret reliies on the availability of mature and comprehensive set of tooling and libraries. The reduces development time and effort required to build the configuration file parser.

Allow hierarchical data #

Simple applications may only require a flat list of key-value pairs. However, more complex applications may require hierarchical data structures to represent the configuration settings. For example, you may need to group related settings together in a nested structure, or you may need to define arrays of values.

Support for Comments #

Although naming the configuration settings well can make the configuration file self-explanatory, sometimes it is useful to include comments in the configuration file to provide additional context or explanations. This is especially useful when sharing the configuration file with other developers or system administrators, or commenting out settings that are not currently in use or are being tested.

Support for Validation #

Another important consideration is whether the configuration file format supports validation. This means that the file format includes a way to define rules and constraints that the configuration settings must adhere to. For example, you may want to specify that a particular setting must is mandatory, or that a setting must be an integer or a string. Again the availability of validation libraries and tools can reduce the development time to add configuration file validation.

Problem with JSON for Configuration #

JSON is a popular format for configuration files because it is easy to read and write, and it is supported by many programming languages and tools. However, one of the main limitations of JSON is that it does not support comments. This means that you cannot include comments in a JSON file.

Although JSON supports hierarchical data structures, it can be difficult to read and edit complex JSON files, especially if the file contains a lot of nested objects and arrays. This can make it difficult to manage and maintain the configuration file, especially as the file grows in size and complexity.

Example JSON Configuration File

{
  "webapp": {
    "name": "ExampleApp",
    "environment": {
      "production": {
        "database": {
          "host": "prod-db.example.com",
          "credentials": {
            "username": "prod_user"
          }
        },
        "server": {
          "host": "prod-server.example.com",
          "ssl": true
        }
      },
      "staging": {
        "database": {
          "host": "staging-db.example.com",
          "credentials": {
            "username": "staging_user"
          }
        },
        "server": {
          "host": "staging-server.example.com",
          "ssl": false
        }
      },
      "development": {
        "database": {
          "host": "localhost",
          "credentials": {
            "username": "dev_user"
          }
        },
        "server": {
          "host": "localhost",
          "ssl": false
        }
      }
    },
    "features": {
      "authentication": {
        "enabled": true,
        "methods": ["password", "oauth"]
      },
      "caching": {
        "enabled": true,
        "type": "redis"
      }
    }
  }
}

Problem with YAML for Configuration #

YAML is another popular format for configuration files that is widely used because it is easy to read and write, and it supports comments. However, YAML has some limitations that make it less suitable for configuration files in some cases.

For example, YAML is whitespace-sensitive, which means that the indentation of the file is significant. For highly nested structures, this can make the file difficult to read and edit, especially if the indentation is not consistent. This can lead to errors and unexpected behavior when working with the configuration file.

This indentation sensitivity can also lead to unexpected behavior if the particular setting is optional. For example, if you accidentally change the indentation of an optional setting, the setting may be missed by the application that reads the configuration file.

Example YAML Configuration File

webapp:
  name: ExampleApp  # Name of the web application
  environment:
    production:  # Production environment settings
      database:
        host: prod-db.example.com  # Production database host
        credentials:
          username: prod_user  # Username for production database
      server:
        host: prod-server.example.com  # Production server host
        ssl: true  # SSL enabled for production server
    staging:  # Staging environment settings
      database:
        host: staging-db.example.com  # Staging database host
        credentials:
          username: staging_user  # Username for staging database
      server:
        host: staging-server.example.com  # Staging server host
        ssl: false  # SSL not enabled for staging server
    development:  # Development environment settings
      database:
        host: localhost  # Development database host
        credentials:
          username: dev_user  # Username for development database
      server:
        host: localhost  # Development server host
        ssl: false  # SSL not enabled for development server
  features:
    authentication:
      enabled: true  # Authentication feature enabled
      methods:  # Supported authentication methods
        - password
        - oauth
    caching:
      enabled: true  # Caching feature enabled
      type: redis  # Type of caching (Redis)

XML Features for Configuration #

XML has all the features required for a configuration file format. It is human-readable, machine-readable, supports hierarchical data structures, and allows comments. XML also supports validation through the use of XML Schema Definition (XSD) files, which define the structure and constraints of the XML document.

Since XML is more self-descriptive, it is easier to understand the structure of the configuration file and locate specific settings. However, this makes XML files larger and more verbose than JSON or YAML files. This may not be a problem for configuration files, as they are typically only edited during the initial setup of the application or system.Large configuration files do pose a probelm when they are read often or transmitted over the network. Solutions would be to cache the parsed configuration file in memory or use a more compact format like JSON or YAML for these cases.

XML also has a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries for parsing, transforming (using XSLT), and validating XML documents. This makes it easy to work with XML configuration files in a variety of programming languages and environments.

XPath, is a query language for selecting nodes in an XML document. For configuration files that is usful to extract specific settings or sections from the configuration file, without having to walk through the entire nested document. A useful use case would be a configuration file that is shared across multiple applications, where each application only needs a sub-section of this common configuration file.

Example XML Configuration File

<webapp>
  <!-- Name of the web application -->
  <name>ExampleApp</name>
  <environment>
    <!-- Production environment settings -->
    <production>
      <database>
        <!-- Production database host -->
        <host>prod-db.example.com</host>
        <credentials>
          <!-- Username for production database -->
          <username>prod_user</username>
        </credentials>
      </database>
      <server>
        <!-- Production server host -->
        <host>prod-server.example.com</host>
        <!-- SSL enabled for production server -->
        <ssl>true</ssl>
      </server>
    </production>
    <!-- Staging environment settings -->
    <staging>
      <database>
        <!-- Staging database host -->
        <host>staging-db.example.com</host>
        <credentials>
          <!-- Username for staging database -->
          <username>staging_user</username>
        </credentials>
      </database>
      <server>
        <!-- Staging server host -->
        <host>staging-server.example.com</host>
        <!-- SSL not enabled for staging server -->
        <ssl>false</ssl>
      </server>
    </staging>
    <!-- Development environment settings -->
    <development>
      <database>
        <!-- Development database host -->
        <host>localhost</host>
        <credentials>
          <!-- Username for development database -->
          <username>dev_user</username>
        </credentials>
      </database>
      <server>
        <!-- Development server host -->
        <host>localhost</host>
        <!-- SSL not enabled for development server -->
        <ssl>false</ssl>
      </server>
    </development>
  </environment>
  <features>
    <authentication>
      <!-- Authentication feature enabled -->
      <enabled>true</enabled>
      <!-- Supported authentication methods -->
      <methods>
        <method>password</method>
        <method>oauth</method>
      </methods>
    </authentication>
    <caching>
      <!-- Caching feature enabled -->
      <enabled>true</enabled>
      <!-- Type of caching (Redis) -->
      <type>redis</type>
    </caching>
  </features>
</webapp>

Summary #

The following table summarizes the key points about XML, JSON, and YAML as configuration file formats.

Feature/Aspect XML JSON YAML
Validation Supports schema validation via DTD and XSD Limited native support for schema validation; external tools needed No built-in validation support
Hierarchical Data Excellent for representing complex hierarchical structures Can represent nested structures but may become cumbersome Readable for simple structures; error-prone with deep nesting
Tooling and Libraries Rich ecosystem of tools for parsing, transforming (XSLT), querying(XPath) and validation Good support but fewer advanced features compared to XML Decent support but fewer tools compared to XML
Human-Readable Human-readable but can be verbose Human-readable and concise Highly human-readable but whitespace sensitivity can lead to errors
Comments Supports comments within the document Does not support comments Supports comments
Transformation and Querying Supports advanced querying (XPath) and transformation (XSLT) Limited querying and transformation capabilities Limited querying and transformation capabilities
Readability with Deep Nesting Maintains readability with deep nesting Readability decreases with deep nesting Readability significantly decreases with deep nesting due to indentation sensitivity
Standardization Mature and widely accepted with robust support across platforms and languages Less standardized for schemas; third-party tools are available Less standardized, leading to inconsistencies in parsing